Read the article linked to here:
Written Analysis Coursework
New technologies & digital convergence
FM1 - Written Analysis
I'm a little concerned that progress on this seems to have stalled for most of you. I know we have lots to do for FM2, but given that this element of the coursework was set up some months ago, I had hoped that most of you would have finished it by now. I would like it to be completed by 16th March to ensure I have a chance to check it before Easter.
Please fill in the form below to confirm what you are working on for the Written Analysis:
Star Case Studies
Once you have chosen your star and had that choice approved by me, you can begin compiling your case study.
FM2 - Case Studies
Here is what you need to do build up a range of Case Study material for FM2 (especially Section A).
- visual materials (including marketing materials, images from the internet and magazine publications)
- written materials (including extracts from trade journals, fan magazines, internet sources and other media)
- tabular material (including numerical information)
The UK Film Industry Today -
- In terms of subject matter, financing, and production, how is a film defined as a 'British Film'? (p276-8 of the AS level text book will help you with this, but you should consider other possible definitions, especially given that the UK Film Council was abolished last year).
- What different types of financing and distribution of films is available in the UK? (The Film Industry Pack is very useful for this, but again the situation is constantly changing so you should check for the most up-to-date information
- What types of British films do British audiences see?
- What restrictions are there to British audiences seeing British films?
- How does the success (or otherwise) of British films in Britain compare with their success in overseas markets?
- Should the 'success' of British films be measured only in terms of box office receipts? What other measures might there be, and again, is there any difference between Britain itself and the rest of the world in how 'successful' British films are on these other measures?
FM2 - Key Figures in British Cinema History
Here's the collated document with the work you have done on this so far. Please edit the original document to meet the requirements I've asked for. Thank you!
A Short History of British Film - Independent Study
From around 1930 there a variety of strands/styles/genres that have been dominant in British Cinema:
- Realism – as well as a sub-category of documentary/social realism
- Fantastical/Formalist
- Genre – horror and comedy have been two dominant genres
- Big budget
- Historical/literary/heritage
You should find out the meaning of these terms if you are unfamiliar with them before you start.
Research the following directors and film companies, and decide:
(i) which category they fall into (they might not fit into one or any definate category)
(ii) when they were dominant
(iii) name at least two films associated with them (and try and to watch some of those films)
(iv) write up your information and email it to me so that I can collate your responses for the benefit of the rest of the class. I have done John Grierson as an example of the kind of work I am looking for (see below):
The Archers(Powell/Pressburger)
Nic Roeg
Early Hitchcock
Woodfall Films
Ealing Studios
Alexander Korda
Hammer Films
Gerald Thomas
Derek Jarman
Film Four
Handmade Films
Working Title
Carol Reed
Eon Productions
Danny Boyle
Goldcrest Films
Michael Winterbottom
Ken Loach
Kenneth Branagh
Ken Russell
Nick Parks
David Lean
Shane Meadows
Neil Jordan
Lynne Ramsey
Gurinder Chadha
Gainsborough Pictures (mid ‘40s)
As far as British Film is concerned, he is most significant for his involvement of ‘public service’ film making. Much of his early work was with the government agency the Empire Marketing Board,promoting British trade (and cultural values) throughout the British Empire. Perhaps his most famous work was produced while he was head of the film unit at the General Post Office (GPO), especially the film Night Mail which featured a celebrated poetic narration written by W H Audenand narrated by Grierson himself.
However, Grierson is not really a film ‘director’ in the sense in which that term is now usually understood. Indeed the only film for which he is credited as director is the 1929 film Drifters which appeared on the same bill as Eisenstein’s Battleship Potemkin, and reflected Grierson’s interest inModernism. Grierson’s role was more often akin to that of a producer in the modern sense.
Indeed, the documentary movement took a collaborative approach to filmmaking, often with no single director being credited, and with those involved sometimes taking multiple roles, both within and between projects. In 1937 Grierson resigned from the GPO to join Film Centre, “an advisory and coordinating body for the documentary film movement” Both in Britain, and later, during the second world war, in Canada, Grierson was involved in the production of films that are often regarded as propoganda. However the work produced by the documentary movement is often seen as not only having cinematic interest and value in its own right, but also as having a significant influence on the Social Realism movement that dominated more 'mainstream' British cinema from the 1940's.

0 Comments